Monitoring the Health Academy program from 2015 to 2017

  • Sofia Wolker Manta Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Paula Fabrício Sandreschi Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Camila Tomicki Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Lisandra Maria Konrad Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Emanuele Naiara Quadros Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Cezar Grontowski Ribeiro Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Juciléia Barbosa Bezerra Federal University of Pará. Brazil.
  • Paulo Vitor de Souza Degree in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Elaine Cristina Maciel Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
  • Danielle Keylla Alencar Cruz Ministry of Health. Health Care Secretariat. Brazil.
  • Tânia Rosane Bertoldo Benedetti Postgraduate Program in Physical Education. Federal University of Santa Catarina. Brazil.
Keywords: Public health, Health promotion, Motor activity

Abstract

To analyze the implementation of the Health Academy Program over three years (2015 to 2017). The data is taken from the annual monitoring of the application of poles of the Health Academy Program in Brazil through questionnaires answered by the state, cities and poles management. The variables investigated were number of poles per region, active professionals, developed actions and target audience attendance. We performed a descriptive analysis of absolute and relative frequency and inferential analysis to the differences in proportions among the years. Monitoring response rate increased, especially in the northeast region; more than 88% of the poles maintained a higher proportion of physical education professionals; significant increase in actions of corporal practices and physical activity (2015 vs 2016) and reduction in actions on food (2015 vs 2016), complementary integrative practices (2015 vs 2016) and care for the elderly (2015 vs 2017).There has been a disparity in the regions that adopted the program over the years and the monitoring may contribute to health promotion strategy.

Published
2019-09-17
Section
Originals
Page/s
16-20